Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Mena v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 7:2017cv00394
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Alejandro H. Mena and Perla Mena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perla Martinez v. Amparts Sourcing, Inc.
as 5:2016cv01222
Defendant:
Amparts Sourcing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Perla Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez v. USA
as 4:2016cv00706
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Perla Yazmine Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rio Perla Properties, L.P. v. San Antonio Brewing Company, LLC
as 5:2016cv00771
Plaintiff:
Rio Perla Properties, L.P.
Defendant:
San Antonio Brewing Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Flores Perla v. Perla Velasquez
as 4:2016cv01944
Plaintiff:
Jose Omar Flores Perla
Defendant:
Jacqueline Ivonneth Perla Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11607
Garza-Sanchez v. United States Of America
as 7:2016cv00388
Plaintiff:
Perla Garza-Sanchez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gomez et al v. Hellerstedt, et al
as 7:2016mc00613
Plaintiff:
Juana Gomez
Defendant:
John Hellerstedt, Geraldine Harris and Chris Traylor
Movant:
Perla Lara
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ferrer Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03540
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Ferrer Enterprises, Inc., Vimvirl A. Ferrer and Perla A. Ferrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Honduras Maya Cafe & Bar LLC et al
as 4:2015cv03338
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Honduras Maya Cafe & Bar LLC, Perla Lemus and Ulises Lemus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barrientos et al v. Syngenta Seed Inc., et al
as 7:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
Felipe Barrientos, Jr. , Felipe Barrientos, Sr. , Jose Castorena, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Seed Inc., Cristobal Mendoza, Sr. and Cristobal Mendoza, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
