Cases 31 - 40 of 79
DOOLEY v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv01114
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DOOLEY
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. SINGLETON et al
as 2:2015cv01014
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JONES
Defendant:
RAYMOND SINGLETON, MICHAEL EDINGER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOLLOIVER et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS TOLLOIVER and JOHN SULLIVAN
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
SEAN MITCHELL
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MALOY v. WALKER et al
as 2:2014cv06964
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MALOY
Defendant:
JEFFREY WALKER, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-25, POLICE OFFICER JANE DOES 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADER v. POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-25 et al
as 2:2014cv06963
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MADER
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-25, POLICE OFFICER JANE DOES 1-25 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEILD v. SPEISER et al
as 2:2014cv06965
Plaintiff:
EDWARD NEILD
Defendant:
JOHN SPEISER, ANTHONY PAROTTI, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv06377
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Jane Doe 1, Police Officers John Doe 1, 2 and 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv06236
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, MICHAEL SPICER, JOSEPH MCCLOSKEY and others
Plaintiff:
CHIHEAN JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2014cv05828
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JACKSON
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, MICHAEL SPICER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
