Cases 31 - 40 of 62
SINGLETON v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv04134
Plaintiff:
KENNETH Q. SINGLETON
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROCKINGTON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07102
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDI Q. BROCKINGTON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAUMGATEM v. ORTIZ
as 1:2016cv06109
Petitioner:
ANTHONY Q. BAUMGATEM
Respondent:
DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAMOS v. DAYE et al
as 2:2016cv00050
Plaintiff:
RAMONCITO RAMOS
Defendant:
DAYE, Q. ROBERTSON, KNOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PRYSTOWSKY
as 2:2015cv08667
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LIGAYA Q. PRYSTOWSKY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
HAMLETT v. CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2015cv07402
Plaintiff:
RAMON Q. HAMLETT
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARCHIONDA v. EMBASSY SUITES, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04059
Plaintiff:
CHERI MARCHIONDA
Defendant:
EMBASSY SUITES, INC., EMBASSY SUITES FRANCHISE, LLC , EMBASSY SUITES MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Q+FOOD LLC v. MITSUBISHI FUSO TRUCK OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2014cv06046
Plaintiff:
Q+FOOD LLC
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI FUSO TRUCK OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Q+FOOD LLC v. MITSUBISHI FUSO TRUCK OF AMERICA, INC.
as 3:2014cv06046
Plaintiff:
Q+FOOD LLC
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI FUSO TRUCK OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
SHERROD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2014cv01143
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM Q. SHERROD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
