Cases 31 - 40 of 54
REDD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23872
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
OMAR LORENZO REDD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REDD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13239
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODERICK REDD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REDD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02647
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
TERRY REDD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REDD v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03382
Plaintiff:
VIOLET REDD
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03215
Plaintiff:
RYAN COOPER, ERIC VIHINEN, JOSEPH TOPPING and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Searcy v. Prison Rehab Industries & ENT. Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01395
Defendant:
Mr. S.B. Rossiter, Mrs. Julie Jone, Mrs. M. A. Lyon and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Edwards et al
as 3:2017cv00944
Plaintiff:
James Clifton Bradley
Defendant:
L. A. Edwards, L. Moore and Redd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent. Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00447
Plaintiff:
Ronald Searcy
Defendant:
Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent. Inc., R. Yax, S. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Ceo,Past and Present Presidents Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent Ing. et al
as 3:2015cv01104
Plaintiff:
Ronald Searcy
Defendant:
Ceo,Past and Present Presidents Prison Rehab Industries & Dive Ent Ing., R. Yax, S. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. McNeal et al
as 3:2013cv01270
Plaintiff:
Douglas T. Edwards
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeal, Mark Redd, Steven F. Singer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
