Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Ramirez v. Target Stores, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00082
Defendant:
Target Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ana Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morales et al v. Gourmet Heaven, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01333
Defendant:
Gourmet Heaven, Inc. and Chung Cho
Plaintiff:
Ulber Morales , Julio Olivar , Hisai Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vicente-Hernandez et al v. A.A.D.V., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01234
Defendant:
A.A.D.V., Inc. and Valentin Stokaj
Plaintiff:
Orlando Vicente-Hernandez and Pedro Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Faryniarz v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2013cv01064
Plaintiff:
Joseph Faryniarz
Defendant:
Jose E. Ramirez , Obagi Medical Products, Inc. and JR Chem, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Saunders v. Briner et al
as 3:2013cv00705
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Saunders
Defendant:
Clark Briner, Revere Capital, LLC, Revere Investments, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Vanessa Ramirez, Michael Giannone, Revere Capital Management, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Sloan Saunders, Saunders Capital, LLC, Cedar Hill Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Stiggle v. Arnone et al
as 3:2013cv00238
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Stiggle, Sr.
Defendant:
Leo Arnone, Peter Murphy, Scott Erfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Gibson
as 3:2012cv01073
Petitioner:
Jose Juan Ramirez
Respondent:
Connie Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. Xpays, Inc.
as 3:2012mc00002
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ramirez
Defendant:
Xpays, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
