Cases 31 - 40 of 63
PERRY et al v. JOHN DOE #1 - MEDICAL SERVICE PROVIDING COMPANY CONTRACTED TO JAIL et al
as 2:2012cv03046
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND PERRY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1 - MEDICAL SERVICE PROVIDING COMPANY CONTRACTED TO JAIL, PAUL PIERRE, JOHN DOE #2 - TREATING PHYSICIAN OF MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2011cv14282
Plaintiff:
Raymond Perry
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PERRY v. AVILES et al
as 2:2011cv03002
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND PERRY
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and COUNTY OF HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Perry v. Florida Department of Correcti
as 11-12205
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND PERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Raymond Perry v. Michael McNeil, et al
as 11-11785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. MCNEIL, J. AVILES, NAZARANO and others
Perry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv14136
Petitioner:
Raymond Perry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perry v. State of Florida
as 2:2011cv14125
Plaintiff:
Raymond Perry
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv00162
Petitioner:
Raymond Perry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perry v. McNeil et al
as 3:2011cv00281
Plaintiff:
Raymond Perry
Defendant:
Michael A. McNeil, J. Aviles, Nazarano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON et al v. NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60732
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND PERRY WILSON and LENORA WILSON
Defendant:
NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
