Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Deep Woods Holdings, L.L.C. v. Savings Deposit Insurance Fund
as 11-1471
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Deep Woods Holdings, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Erol Aksoy
Defendant - Appellant:
Savings Deposit Insurance Fund of The Republic of Turkey, Tasarruf Mevduati Sigorta Fund
Central Bank of the Republic o, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 11-70092
:
In re: CENTRAL BANK OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY and T.C. ZIRAAT BANKASI
Petitioner:
CENTRAL BANK OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY and T.C. ZIRAAT BANKASI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
GARBIS DAVOYAN and HRAYR TURABIAN
Alex Bakalian et al v. Republic of Turkey et al
as 2:2010cv09596
Plaintiff:
Alex Bakalian, Anais Haroutunian and Rita Mahdessian
Defendant:
Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Does, Republic of Turkey and others
Garbis Davoyan et al v. Republic of Turkey et al
as 2:2010cv05636
Plaintiff:
Garbis Davoyan and Hrayr Turabian
Defendant:
Republic of Turkey, T.C. Ziraat Bankasi and The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey
TOUMAZOU et al v. REPUBLIC OF TURKEY et al
as 1:2009cv01967
Plaintiff:
MICHALI TOUMAZOU, NICOLAS KANTZILARIS and MAROULLA TOMPAZOU
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF TURKEY and TURKISH REPUBLIC OF NORTHERN CYPRUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Deep Woods Holdings, L.L.C v. Savings Deposit Insurance Fund of The Republic of Turkey
as 1:2007cv00934
Plaintiff:
Deep Woods Holdings, L.L.C, Deep Woods Holdings, L.L.C and Deep Woods Holdings, L.L.C
Defendant:
Savings Deposit Insurance Fund of The Republic of Turkey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
OHNTRUP et al v. MAKINA VE KIMYA ENDUSTRISI KURUMU et al
as 2:1976cv00742
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY OHNTRUP and ROBERT OHNTRUP
Defendant:
MAKINA VE KIMYA ENDUSTRISI KURUMU, THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY and FIREARMS CENTER INCORPORATED
Movant:
ALLIAN TECHSYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
