Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Resto v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00458
Petitioner:
Henry Resto
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caminos v. Spice Resto-Lounge, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv23973
Plaintiff:
Carlos Sergio Caminos
Defendant:
Spice Resto-Lounge, Inc. , Frank C. Hernandez and Arnaldo Batista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv61632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Resto-Hernandez v. Terex Utilities, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00377
Plaintiff:
Alexander Resto-Hernandez
Defendant:
Terex Utilities, Inc. , Terex-Telelect, Inc. , Utility Equipment Leasing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lasprilla v. Bastista et al
as 0:2010cv60149
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lasprilla
Defendant:
Arnaldo Batista and Spice Resto-Lounge, Inc.
Mediator:
Neil Flaxman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Garcia v. Spice Resto-Lounge, Inc.
as 0:2009cv61892
Plaintiff:
Yoshlai Garcia
Defendant:
Spice Resto-Lounge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Resto v. Casino Auto Service & Towing, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv00707
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Resto
Defendant:
Casino Auto Service & Towing, Inc. and Ana M. Matas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Karakis v. Spice Resto-Lounge, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv60261
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Karakis
Defendant:
Spice Resto-Lounge, Inc., Jeffrey Mac Baxt, TR and Danielle Amanda Baxt, TR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Resto v. National Auto Brokers of Orlando, LLC et al
as 6:2007cv00129
Plaintiff:
Hiram Resto and Hiram Resto
Defendant:
National Auto Brokers of Orlando, LLC and Jonathan Omari
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
