Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Eliot Holdings et al v. Faps Holdings et al
as 2:2012cv00860
Plaintiff:
Eliot Holdings , Ron E. Dichter , John W. Howe and others
Defendant:
Faps Holdings , Neil L. Randel and Debra Bradford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Spinola v. Futch et al
as 2:2012cv00507
Plaintiff:
Ann Spinola
Defendant:
James M. Futch, III, New World Fuel, Pentwater Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanko v. WCDI et al
as 2:2012cv00178
Defendant:
Anthony Petzitillo, WCDI, The Estate Of Ron Piccolo and others
Plaintiff:
John Evanko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CollegeAmerica Services v. Western Benefit Solutions et al
as 2:2011cv01208
Plaintiff:
CollegeAmerica Services
Defendant:
Western Benefit Solutions , Ron Osborne and Kent Keoppel
Counter_claimant:
Western Benefit Solutions
Counter_defendant:
CollegeAmerica Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bankhead v. Jeneatti et al
as 2:2011cv00587
Plaintiff:
Fabian Lyle Bankhead
Defendant:
Jacob Jeneatti, FNU DeLora, Annie Tippetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing
as 2:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
Ron Chavez and Melissa Chavez
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Redmond v. Wilson et al
as 2:2011cv00012
Defendant:
Ron Wilson and Stephanie Eberle
Plaintiff:
Tim Kent Redmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiedemann v. Johnson et al
as 2:2010cv01224
Plaintiff:
Edgar Tiedemann
Defendant:
FNU Johnson and Ron Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morkel v. Davis et al
as 2:2010cv01176
Plaintiff:
Kirsteen Didi Morkel
Defendant:
Lynn W. Davis, Sandra Dredge, Kelly Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beazley Insurance v. Insite Engineering et al
as 2:2010cv01137
Plaintiff:
Beazley Insurance
Defendant:
Insite Engineering, Robert Reid, Ron Larsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
