Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Pedro Meza v. Rosanne Campbell
as 09-56262
Petitioner - Appellant: PEDRO MEZA
Respondent - Appellee: ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-16404
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae - Pending: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16404
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Ruben Perez v. Rosanne Campbell
as 09-16269
Petitioner - Appellant: RUBEN DURRANT PEREZ
Respondent - Appellee: ROSANNE CAMPBELL
Ty Lopes v. Rosanne Campbell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-15769
Petitioner - Appellant: TY ERIK LOPES
Respondent - Appellee: ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Abreu v. Braga, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00763
Plaintiff: Armando Abreu
Defendant: F. Braga, R. Diamond, Rosanne Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Tenore v. Rosanne Campbell
as 09-15427
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL B. TENORE
Respondent - Appellee: ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden, Mule Creek State Prison
David Shaw, Sr. v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 09-15405
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID SHAW, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee: ROSANNE CAMPBELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ty Lopes v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 09-15207
Petitioner - Appellant: TY ERIK LOPES
Respondent - Appellee: ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ty Lopes v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 09-15208
Petitioner - Appellant: TY ERIK LOPES
Respondent - Appellee: ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?