Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Ouzouiana et al v. Zimmer et al
as 2:2013cv00386
Plaintiff:
Ruth Ouzouiana and George Ouzouiana
Defendant:
Zimmer, Zimmer Holdings and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fuller et al v. Bartholomew et al
as 2:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
David Fuller and Ruth M. Fuller
Defendant:
Lynn W. Davis , Mary Noonan , Jay Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruth B Hardy Revocable Trust et al v. Rindlesbach et al
as 2:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Ruth B Hardy Revocable Trust , Delcon Corporation Profit Sharing Plan , Finesse and others
Defendant:
Brenda N. Rindlesbach , Mark L. Rindlesbach and Mark Lee Rindlesbach
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Castro v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Ruth Castro
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Reed v. United States Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 2:2011cv01211
Petitioner:
Ruth Ellen Reed
Respondent:
United States Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Glasser et al v. PacifiCorp
as 2:2011cv00947
Plaintiff:
Thomas Glasser , Ruth Glasser , Christopher Glasser and others
Defendant:
PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00916
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00889
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00882
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
