Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mendy v. Bell Bank et al
as 2:2026cv02278
Plaintiff:
Alphonse J. Mendy
Defendant:
Bell Bank, Bell Bank Mortgage, Bell Bank Mortgage Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Robertson v. Morris Smith Ford Leavenworth LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02273
Plaintiff:
Gregory Alan Robertson
Defendant:
Morris Smith Ford Leavenworth LLC and Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. v. Kris Kobach
as 2:2026cv02254
Plaintiff:
Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.
Defendant:
Kirs Kobach, in his official capacity as the Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
