Cases 31 - 40 of 547
Roberts v. Talaris Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Stacie Roberts
Defendant:
Talaris Therapeutics, Inc., Francois Nader, Sandip Agarwala and others
Roux et al v. Okhandiar et al
as 1:2023cv01056
Defendant:
Krishna Okhandiar, Rohit Okhandiar, Charlotte Fang and others
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Roux, John Duff, III, Henry Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 1:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Zynerba Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Morgan Smith
Defendant:
Zynerba Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Armando Anido, Warren D. Cooper and others
Richards III v. Burgos et al
as 1:2023cv00911
Defendant:
Jacklyn A. Reaviles, PFC Daniel Burgos, Jacklyn A. Shipley and others
Plaintiff:
George Firman Richards III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Magenta Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Magenta Therapeutics, Inc., Alison Lawton, Jeffrey Albers and others
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00854
Petitioner:
James Richard Smith, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. CIRCOR International, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
CIRCOR International, Inc., Helmuth Ludwig, Samuel R. Chapin and others
Smith v. Sigilon Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Sigilon Therapeutics, Inc., Eric Shaff, Robert Ruffolo, Jr. and others
Powell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Shavortis Powell, Emery Day, Jessica Knoke and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
