Cases 31 - 40 of 4,122
Hawkins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02925
Plaintiff:
Constance Hawkins and David Hawkins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , American Medical Systems, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roben v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02356
Plaintiff:
Debra Jean Roben
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02249
Plaintiff:
Rita Jones and Kenneth Jones
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cardoza v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01980
Plaintiff:
Ina Cardoza
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Langer v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01428
Plaintiff:
Karen Langer
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Symons v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01352
Plaintiff:
Dawn Symons
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01034
Plaintiff:
Darlene Ellis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dery v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00963
Plaintiff:
Sue Dery
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoeft et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00897
Plaintiff:
Robin Hoeft and Daniel Hoeft
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blackwell et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00925
Plaintiff:
Michelle Blackwell and Thomas Blackwell
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
