Cases 31 - 40 of 539
Tutankhaman v. Woods et al
as 2:2022cv01894
Plaintiff:
King Dr. Mygu Michael Nygu Tutankhaman Lagos Halios, Dr. Michael D Gates, III, Michael Maxwell Hill and others
Defendant:
Kimberly Woods
Tutankhaman v. Nestle
as 2:2022cv01877
Plaintiff:
King Dr. Mygu Michael Nygu Tutankhaman Lagos Halios, King Dr. Michael V. Dumpledore, III, Michael Maxwell Hill and others
Defendant:
Nestle
Snider et al v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv01723
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Snider and Lauren Snider
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Charles Daniels, William Quenga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sharpe v. Ruiz et al
as 2:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
Ray Sharpe
Defendant:
Ruiz, Calvin Johnson, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harriel v. Reno Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel C. Harriel, Sr.
Defendant:
Reno Police Department, Sanchez, Tyler Altom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nemeth v. Judd
as 2:2022cv01390
Plaintiff:
Mark Nemeth
Defendant:
Judd Spencer, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Dreesen et al
as 2:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
F. Dreesen, Morin, Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Nadig
as 2:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Darrell Glenn Sr. Lee
Defendant:
Benjamin Nadig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gioiosa v. NRS Expiration
as 2:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Gioiosa, Sr.
Defendant:
NRS Expiration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Harrris et al
as 2:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Aaron L Harrris, Sr., Tah'Jae Ray, Aaron L Harris, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
