Cases 31 - 40 of 20,446
Jenkins v. State of Florida
as 8:2024cv01283
Petitioner:
Johnny Jenkins
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul BurnsIn re: Paul Burns
as 24-11750
Petitioner:
In re: PAUL BURNS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Clovis MossIn re: Clovis Moss
as 24-11759
Petitioner:
In re: CLOVIS MOSS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
MINGO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
LARON A MINGO
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Girtman v. State Attorney Gen Supervision et al
as 8:2024cv01287
Plaintiff:
Calen T. Girtman
Defendant:
State Attorney Gen Supervision, Secretary, State of Florida, Grady Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Roberts v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11688
Petitioner:
JAMES T. ROBERTS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
John Legros v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11693
Petitioner:
JOHN A. LEGROS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
United States of America et al v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03973
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Arizona, State of, Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. and Ticketmaster L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Wright v. United States et al
as 0:2024cv60882
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
United States, The Crown and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Orange County of Florida et al
as 6:2024cv00958
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Orange County of Florida and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
