Cases 31 - 40 of 71
GAINES v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2015cv00761
Petitioner:
HERMAN L. GAINES
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KADONSKY v. KOCH et al
as 3:2014cv08105
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KADONSKY
Defendant:
BRIAN KOCH, SID. OFF. WISE, V. WOJCIECHOWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KADONSKY v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2014cv08104
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KADONSKY
Defendant:
STEPHEN D'ILIO, JAMES FARLEY, ANTONIO CAMPOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YATES v. D'ILIO et al
as 1:2014cv07823
Petitioner:
NATHAN YATES
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2014cv07797
Petitioner:
OMAR N. DAVIS
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CEPATES v. D'ILIO et al
as 2:2014cv07649
Petitioner:
RICARDO CEPATES
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCOTT v. D'ILIO
as 2:2014cv07475
Petitioner:
CLARENCE E. SCOTT, JR.
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUBBARD v. WARDEN, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2014cv07258
Petitioner:
FRANK HUBBARD
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and NEW JERSEY PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KADONSKY v. AHSAN, ET AL.
as 3:2014cv07248
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KADONSKY
Defendant:
ABU AHSAN , DONIQUE IVERY , NURSE LANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWER v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2014cv06886
Petitioner:
TERENCE BREWER
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
