Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Thompson v. Small et al
as 1:2010cv01179
Plaintiff:
Stanton J Thompson
Defendant:
Daniel P Small, Marcus Hardy, Sylvia Mahone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson vs Hardy
as 1:2010cv03088
Plaintiff:
Stanton J Thompson
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Sylvia Mahone, S Taller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasho v. Randle et al
as 1:2010cv01108
Plaintiff:
Ashoor Rasho
Defendant:
Michael P. Randle, Sarah . Johnson, Guy D Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Quinn et al
as 1:2010cv01101
Plaintiff:
Stanton J Thompson
Defendant:
Patrick Quinn, Michael P. Randle, Guy D Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Quinn et al
as 3:2010cv00217
Plaintiff:
Stanton J. Thompson
Defendant:
Patrick Quinn, Michael P. Randle, Guy D Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson et al v. Haabs et al
as 1:2010cv01067
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wilkerson, Sheneka Wilkerson and Yvette Hill
Defendant:
Marge Haabs, Patrick Hastings, Randall Flex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Quinn et al
as 1:2010cv01065
Petitioner:
Stanton J Thompson
Respondent:
Pat Quinn, Michael P. Randle, Guy D Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Harris v. Sylvia Mahone, et al
as 10-1593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SYLVIA MAHONE, SCOTT BAKER, JOHN BIRKLE and others
Thompson v. Quinn et al
as 1:2010cv01051
Plaintiff:
Stanton J Thompson
Defendant:
Patrick Quinn, Michael P Randle, Guy D Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Quinn et al
as 1:2010cv01141
Plaintiff:
Stanton J Thompson
Defendant:
Pat Quinn, Michael P. Randle, Guy D Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
