Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Ernest Coffey v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-1546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST COFFEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SYLVIA MAHONE, ROBERTA FEWS, Deputy Diretor of Department of Corrections, MELVIN HINTON, Chief of Mental Health and Psychiatric Services and others
Williams v. Walker et al
as 1:2017cv01470
Plaintiff:
Jared W Williams
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Roberta Fews, Wendy . Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisle v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2017cv01158
Plaintiff:
Steven D Lisle, Jr
Defendant:
John R Baldwin, Melvin Hinton, Roberta Fews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd May v. Sylvia Mahone, et al
as 17-1103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD MAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SYLVIA MAHONE, ARTHUR FUNK, Doctor and RONALD SCHAEFER, Doctor
Floyd May v. Sylvia Mahone, et al
as 17-1071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD MAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SYLVIA MAHONE, ARTHUR FUNK, Doctor and RONALD SCHAEFER, Doctor
Floyd May v. John Darrah
as 15-3437
Petitioner:
FLOYD MAY
Respondent:
JOHN W. DARRAH
Party-in-Interest:
SYLVIA MAHONE and IMHOTEP CARTER, Doctor
Floyd May v. Sylvia Mahone, et al
as 15-3395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLOYD MAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SYLVIA MAHONE and IMHOTEP CARTER
Clark v. Walker Jr et al
as 1:2015cv01306
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clark
Defendant:
Roger Walker Jr, Roberta Fews, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sammy Moore v. Peter Liszewski, et al
as 14-3244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMMY J. MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER LISZEWSKI, In his individual and official capacities, MARK G. COULEAS, DOCTOR MAHONE, In his individual and official capacities and others
Ronald Macon, Jr. v. Sylvia Mahone, et al
as 13-2155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. MACON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SYLVIA MAHONE, DENNIS LARSON and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
