Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Bailey v. Thomas et al
as 6:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Silas Lee Bailey
Defendant:
Arthur Thomas, John Doe, 1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingley v. Criag
as 4:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Earl Silas Bingley
Defendant:
Brian Criag
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Panzu v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2009cv00754
Petitioner:
Silas S Panzu
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bingley v. Criag
as 1:2009cv00994
Plaintiff:
Earl Silas Bingley
Defendant:
Brian Criag
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Calvert et al
as 1:2009cv00782
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Ronald Fontenont, Anthony Burrell, Silas Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Panzu v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv00438
Petitioner:
Silas S Panzu
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Policemen and Firemen Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Cornelison
as 4:2009cv01918
Plaintiff:
Policemen and Firemen Retirement System of the City of Detroit, Policemen and Firemen Retirement System of the City of Detroit, Policemen and Firemen Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Defendant:
Albert O Cornelison, Jr, Robert L Crandall, Halliburton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Pope et al v. Mylan, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
Garland Pope, Garland Pope, Anna Pope and others
Defendant:
Mylan, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Mylan Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bingley v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv04262
Petitioner:
Earl Silas Bingley
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
