Cases 31 - 40 of 55
MELVILLE v. SPARK ENERGY, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv08706
Defendant:
SPARK ENERGY, INC. and SPARK ENERGY GAS, LLC
Plaintiff:
JOHN MELVILLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STUCHENKO-SPARKS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv06919
Plaintiff:
JO-ANN STUCHENKO-SPARKS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPARKS v. SERVICE FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
as 2:2017cv03899
Defendant:
SERVICE FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
Plaintiff:
KANDACE SPARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOPE-SPARKS v. E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv03263
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HOPE-SPARKS
Defendant:
E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY , JOHN DOES I-V and ABC CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROLLAND v. SPARK ENERGY, LLC
as 3:2017cv02680
Plaintiff:
JANET ROLLAND
Defendant:
SPARK ENERGY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPARKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv01955
Plaintiff:
GEORGE W. SPARKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0740
OBERUCH v. THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 3:2016cv06753
Plaintiff:
JOHN OBERUCH, JR.
Defendant:
THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORDES v. SERVICE TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv04256
Plaintiff:
RICHARD F. CORDES and LORI A CORDES
Defendant:
SERVICE TRUCKING, INC. , HUGH R SPARKS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SPARK INNOVATORS CORP. v. BITS & PIECES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01788
Plaintiff:
SPARK INNOVATORS CORP.
Defendant:
BITS & PIECES, INC., HAWTHORNE DIRECT LLC and MELVILLE DIRECT LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
