Cases 31 - 40 of 1,962
Bond v. Brown, et al.
as 24-1469
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOND
Defendant:
KATHERINE BROWN and STATE OF OREGON, a municipal corporation
DeRemer v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Ross DeRemer
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stauffer, et al. v. Matarazzo, et al.
as 24-1091
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM STAUFFER and LAURA L. STAUFFER
Defendant:
JUDITH H. MATARAZZO, STATE OF OREGON COURTS, ANNA K. SORTUN and others
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Other:
Brad Greenspan
Kendoll v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Michael Kendoll
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Department of Oregon State Police, Cpl. Josh Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Washington, et al v. FERC
as 24-1025
Petitioner:
State of Washington and State of Oregon
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Wells-Beck v. State of Oregon Board of Parole
as 3:2024cv00220
Petitioner:
Katherine Wells-Beck
Respondent:
State of Oregon Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HICKS v. State of Oregon Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM HICKS
Defendant:
State of Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jason Pierce, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. State of Oregon
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jason Pierce, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
