Cases 31 - 40 of 89
STONE v. ZIPPS et al
as 1:2019cv01509
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, JENNIFER G. ZIPPS, ROY R. LUSTIG and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. ZIPPS et al
as 1:2019cv01401
Defendant:
JENNIFER G. ZIPPS, ROY R. LUSTIG, DAVID D. KARTH and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
STONE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv00973
Defendant:
MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ, RON DE SANTIS, WILLIAM BARR and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
ANNETTE TOTTEN, TREY TREADWELL, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Plaintiff:
AZAEL D. PERALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC et al
as 1:2019mc00029
In Re:
APPLICATION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS; CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE NEW YORK TIMES CO.; POLITICO LLC; AND WP CO., LLC
Petitioner:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Respondent:
ROGER STONE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CORSI v. STONE
as 1:2019cv00324
Defendant:
ROGER STONE
Plaintiff:
JEROME CORSI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARPAIO v. ZUCKER et al
as 1:2018cv02894
Defendant:
ROLLING STONE, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., JEFF ZUCKER and others
Plaintiff:
JOE ARPAIO and JOSEPH MICHAEL ARPAIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER, et al. v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv02182
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCAN ST. FRANCIS HEALTH - BEECH GROVE CAMPUS, GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER, BRYAN MEDICAL CENTER - EAST CAMPUS and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER et al v. ALEX M. AZAR, II
as 1:2018cv01993
Plaintiff:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH BALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, SAINT LUKE'S HOSPITAL, PARKRIDGE WEST HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
