Cases 31 - 40 of 84
SYED v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv07931
Plaintiff:
YASMIN SYED
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUCIDO v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv06361
Plaintiff:
MARY LUCIDO
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SYED M AHMED, AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUSLIM v. RIZVI et al
as 2:2017cv06036
Plaintiff:
SEYFULDEEN AKDIL MUSLIM
Defendant:
SYED RIZVI, APRIL LAWRENCE, SHELLY BENETEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05409
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ABIDI et al v. BARRY et al
as 2:2017cv01976
Plaintiff:
SYED ABIDI and TASMIN Z ABIDI
Defendant:
JAMES C. BARRY and COWAN EQUIPMENT LEASING, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harders et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00726
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Plaintiff:
Christine Harders , Tammy Abell , Karen Arnholt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AMIRIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. HTN WIRELESS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
AMIRIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
HTN WIRELESS, INC. and SYED MUNEEB ARSHAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AHMED v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv08936
Plaintiff:
SYED AHMED
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO. and MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MYER v. Anicette, et al
as 2:2016cv08862
Plaintiff:
DONALD W. MYER
Defendant:
SYED RIZVI and LIONEL ANICETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
