Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,369
Escobedo v. Warden, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner: Ramiro Escobedo
Respondent: Warden, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunham v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00247
Petitioner: Thomas Eugene Dunham
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00985
Petitioner: James McCoy
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff: Joe Earl Smith
Defendant: Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosher v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner: Daniel Emmett Mosher
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00352
Petitioner: Eric Clark
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jean v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01421
Petitioner: Joseph F. Jean
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thornton v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00902
Petitioner: Shedrick Thornton
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00198
Petitioner: Thomas Richie McBride
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00054
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?