Cases 31 - 40 of 1,726
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THOMAS v. SHEEHY NISSAN OF WALDORF
as 1:2023cv03479
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. THOMAS
Defendant:
SHEEHY NISSAN OF WALDORF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FARMER v. GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF MARYLAND, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv03318
Plaintiff:
DEIDRE FARMER
Defendant:
GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF MARYLAND, INC. and THOMAS J. SENKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. TOGGAS et al
as 1:2023cv03226
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
THOMAS TOGGAS and KATHRYN ANN TOGGAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
PATEL v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ADAIR FORD BOROUGHS, KAMALA D. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SEARCY v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2023cv03166
Plaintiff:
HENRY SEARCY, JR.
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK and JUSTIN MAXSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HALE EL v. MARTINEZ-THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv03114
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
MICHELLE MARTINEZ-THOMAS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COLORADO and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv03043
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. ALSTON and NO PARTY
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
