Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Alburquerque v. Edwards et al
as 1:2017cv09545
Petitioner:
Miguel Alburquerque
Respondent:
Ron Edwards , Jefferson Sessions , U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09477
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06959
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Orellana Castaneda v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2017cv04267
Defendant:
Matthew T. Albence, Steven Bellone, County of Suffolk and others
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Orellana Castaneda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Menendez-Rodriguez v. Decker et al
as 1:2017cv04809
Respondent:
Thomas Decker , Scott Mechkowski , Thomas D. Homan and others
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Menendez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ndou v. Decker et al
as 1:2017cv03811
Respondent:
Tom Decker , John Kelly , Jefferson Sessions and others
Petitioner:
Laureta Ndou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Decker et al
as 1:2017cv01878
Plaintiff:
Shun Qing Chen
Defendant:
Thomas Decker , Scott Mechkowski , Thomas D. Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hale v. Medicaid Insurers of Life, etc. et al
as 6:2016cv06758
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Rhea Hale
Defendant:
Medicaid Insurers of Life, etc., Verizon Insurers of Insurances Assurances, Herison Insurers of Insurances Assurances and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
