Cases 31 - 40 of 72
BOYCE et al v. Johnson & Johnson
as 3:2017cv12670
Plaintiff:
JOANN D BOYCE and THOMAS M BOYCE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NIZOLEK v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv11789
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. NIZOLEK
Defendant:
JOHN JOHNSON, JOSEPH E. KRAKORA and GEORGE S. NASSIF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYCE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv08259
Plaintiff:
JOANN D BOYCE and THOMAS M BOYCE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARSHALL v. SUN BANCORP, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv07368
Plaintiff:
PAUL PARSHALL
Defendant:
SUN BANCORP, INC., ANTHONY R. COSCIA, JEFFREY S. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CHETCUTI v. SUN BANCORP, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv07329
Plaintiff:
PAUL CHETCUTI
Defendant:
SUN BANCORP, INC., JEFFREY S. BROWN, SIDNEY R. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
REECE et al v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv03134
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. REECE
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DONAHUE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv02750
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. DONAHUE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID OWENS and KATE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAUTZENHEISER v. COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv01248
Plaintiff:
JOHN LAUTZENHEISER
Defendant:
COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION , ZEIN ABDALLA , MAUREEN BREAKIRON-EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOFAN JUNIOR v. PEREKSTA et al
as 3:2016cv08559
Plaintiff:
HENRY SAYE GOFAN JUNIOR
Defendant:
DARLENE J. PEREKSTA, THOMAS M. BROWN, EDWARD A. BELMOUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
