Cases 31 - 40 of 14,969
Sasveld v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02258
Plaintiff:
DEREK A. SASVELD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Eggleston et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03974
Plaintiff:
Jason Eggleston and Kim Henderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
United States of America v. Cole
as 1:2024cv02804
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brandon Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Negron v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03939
Plaintiff:
Willie Negron
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Cooks v. Cortez et al
as 1:2024cv03937
Plaintiff:
Sharon Cooks
Defendant:
Sheri Cortez and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Funds Seized from Three Bank of America Accounts: (1) $855,984.04, (2) $1,915,749.60, (3) $594,106.60
as 1:2024cv02619
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Funds Seized from Three Bank of America Accounts: (1) $855,984.04, (2) $1,915,749.60, (3) $594,106.60
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
United States of America v. Gary
as 1:2024cv03818
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Gary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
