Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Aranda-Diaz v. United States Marshals Service
as 5:2012cv00101
Petitioner:
Felix Aranda - Diaz
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dickey v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Sherman Dickey
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CRISP COUNTY GEORGIA, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickey v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 7:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Sherman Dickey
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CRISP COUNTY GEORGIA, JONES COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States Marshal Service
as 1:2011cv02356
Plaintiff:
Franklin L. Williams
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Southeastern Newspaper Company, LLC v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
Southeastern Newspaper Company, LLC
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Townsend v. United States Marshal et al
as 7:2010cv00009
Petitioner:
Bruce Bernard Townsend
Respondent:
United States Marshal, GEO Group Inc., Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. United States Marshal et al
as 1:2009cv03688
Plaintiff:
Bruce Bernard Townsend
Defendant:
United States Marshal, GEO Group Inc., Bowen and others
Jackson v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2009cv00243
Plaintiff:
Derrick B Jackson
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Van Peavy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosby v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jeannie L Cosby
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
