Cases 31 - 40 of 5,013
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv07909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07890
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv07864
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
NARIK WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MINCEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv07842
Petitioner:
RASHEID MINCEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07607
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SORIANO DE LA ROSA et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv07542
Plaintiff:
RAMON SORIANO DE LA ROSA and JOSE REINOSO MEDINA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
ONUORAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv07608
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MARSHALL ONUORAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ESTEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv07432
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOYCE A. ESTEY
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
ABDULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv07337
Petitioner:
IBN ABDULLAH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
