Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Cordero v. Barron et al
as 6:2016cv01013
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Cordero
Defendant:
Unknown Barron, Unknown Vigil, Andrea Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vigil v. United States Of America
as 7:2016cv00259
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Abdon Joe Vigil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vigil v. Exim Strategies Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00608
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Vigil
Defendant:
Exim Strategies Corporation and Patrick Donnell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Vigil
as 7:2015cv00532
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Reymundo Vigil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2014cv02800
Plaintiff:
Teresa Evans , Debra Duca , Helene Friedman and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunn, Jr. v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00358
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kerry Vigil Dunn, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Vigilant Solutions, Inc. et al v. MVConnect LLC et al
as 6:2014cv00466
Plaintiff:
Vigilant Solutions, Inc. and MBP Innovations LLC
Defendant:
MVConnect LLC and Recovery Manager Pro LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cortez v. Mauzey et al
as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Walter Cortez
Defendant:
FNU Mauzey, FNU Fourth, FNU Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vigil v. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03537
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Jane Vigil
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Depuy Ortho
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Vigil et al
as 5:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Virginia G Vigil, David A Vigil, Sandra Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
