Cases 31 - 40 of 3,584
Blake v. Rosalez
as 5:2024cv00498
Petitioner:
Robert Timothy Blake
Respondent:
Warden G. Rosalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frankenfield v. Warden Washington et al
as 4:2024cv01817
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Warden Washington and O.I.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mark Lyle Bell
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Kamilah Coger, Joy Hughes, Todd Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
as 5:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
James Anthony Avila
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Corrales v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duarte-Vasquez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Duarte-Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bush v. Warden, FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Frederick Bush
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Banks v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duncan v. Warden Via Lobos et al
as 4:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Robert H Duncan
Defendant:
Warden Via Lobos, Bryan Collier, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
as 4:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
