Cases 31 - 40 of 116
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS v. BERNHARDT et al
as 1:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Defendant:
U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, WILLIAM PERRY PENDLEY and DAVID L. BERNHARDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
PERRY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv03734
Plaintiff:
DORIS PERRY
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS v. PENDLEY et al
as 1:2019cv03506
Plaintiff:
FRIENDS OF ANIMALS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and WILLIAM PERRY PENDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
PERRY v. EBBERT
as 1:2019cv02093
Petitioner:
RANSOM J. PERRY
Respondent:
DAVID J. EBBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01657
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al v. DONALD J. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv00960
Defendant:
MICK MULVANEY, ANDREW WHEELER, DAVID BERNHARDT and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
REGALADO v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv00851
Defendant:
JUDITH K. GUTHRIE, ANN RICHARDS, LEONARD DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALFRED REGALADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00747
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERRY v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2019cv00637
Plaintiff:
GERALD ALLEN PERRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT and UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
