Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,062
Christians in the Workplace Networking Group v. National Technology and Engineering Solutions, et al
as 24-2072
Plaintiff: CHRISTIANS IN THE WORKPLACE NETWORKING GROUP
Defendant: NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., ESTHER HERNANDEZ, Chief Diversity Officer of Sandia, AARON JIM, EEOC Specialist of Sandia and others
Konecny v. HCA Health Care, et al
as 24-1086
Plaintiff: J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant: HCA HEALTH CARE, INC., SAMUEL N. HAZEN, MEDICAL CITY PLANO, INC. and others
Torgerson v. Starr
as 24-2071
Plaintiff: KEVIN TORGERSON
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER STARR
Konecny v. Boulder Community Health, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff: J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant: BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH, ROBERT VISSERS, JASON ROZESKI and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6078
Plaintiff: MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant: STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
VanBuskirk, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6079
Plaintiff: AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant: STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6080
Plaintiff: AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant: STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff: GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant: GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1087
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Salgado v. Smith
as 24-2068
Plaintiff: ANGELIC SALGADO, as personal representative of the Wrongful Death Estate of Jonathan Molina
Defendant: KEVIN SMITH, in his individual capacity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?