Cases 31 - 40 of 10,362
MUTAZZ v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
SAID MUTAZZ
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, GREGORY SAMPSON, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WISHON v. JACKSON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
SETH AXLEY WISHON
Defendant:
JACKSON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHELPS v. WARDEN PERRY
as 7:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
WILLIE C PHELPS
Respondent:
WARDEN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. BOWEN et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
NORMAN DAVIS
Respondent:
Warden TOMMY BOWEN and CENTRAL STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCKINNEY v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN M GRAHAM, DEPUTY WARDEN N BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Warden ANTOINE CALDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PASCHAL v. AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
as 7:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
CHARLES A PASCHAL, JR
Respondent:
AUGUSTA STATE MEDICAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWMAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
ERICK DAWAYNE BOWMAN
Respondent:
JONES, WILLIE WILSON and RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
BRODRICK M WALKER
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN and ANTONIE CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PADGETT v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. PADGETT, JR
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER, DEPARTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
