Cases 31 - 40 of 1,375
SIKES v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORRUGATED LLC
as 1:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Mr. HENRY SIKES and HENRY SIKES
Defendant:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORRUGATED LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
O'NEAL v. EMS MANAGEMENT & CONSULTANTS, INC.
as 1:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Samantha O'Neal
Defendant:
EMS Management & Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
LU et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
ZHIYUE LU and HUIZHI BAI
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND and JOHN ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SMITH v. ATRIUM HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. SMITH
Defendant:
ATRIUM HEALTH, NORTHEAST MEDICAL CENTER, WHITLEY ENTERPRISES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
REID et al v. ANDREWS
as 1:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. REID and LARRY REID LIVE, LLC
Defendant:
LAVONTRAYE ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
TC HEARTLAND LLC v. SCHIFFMAN
as 1:2023cv00665
Plaintiff:
TC HEARTLAND LLC
Defendant:
SUSAN S SCHIFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
BRAKE v. KEDPLASMA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Hunter Brake
Defendant:
KEDPlasma, LLC and KEDPLASMA, LLC doing business as KEDPLASMA USA doing business as KEDPLASMA UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
STIMPSON v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
JUAN STIMPSON
Defendant:
WALMART, INC. and TRISTATE COMMERCIAL DOORS & SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
STEELE v COSTCO CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
DONNA L STEELE
Defendant:
COSTCO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ZHANG v. BONOMOLO
as 1:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
TAIMING ZHANG
Defendant:
ANDREW JOSEPH BONOMOLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
