Cases 31 - 40 of 1,229
Armstrong v. USA
as 1:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
Terrell Jason Armstrong
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Counts v. USA
as 3:2023cv00193
Petitioner:
Roger Ricky Counts
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Duchaine v. USA
as 1:2023cv00190
Petitioner:
Wade Lawrence Duchaine
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hoff v. Kabbenhoft et al
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hoff
Defendant:
Dave Kabbenhoft, Steve Foster, Joseph Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. United States District Court for the District of North Dakota
as 1:2023cv00147
Petitioner:
Lemont Maurice Rogers
Respondent:
United States District Court for the District of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rockefeller v. Cass County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Royal C. Rockefeller
Defendant:
Cass County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Jesse Jahner, Captain Frobig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Michael Joe Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harvey v. USA
as 3:2023cv00171
Petitioner:
Michael W. Harvey, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harvey v. USA
as 3:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Michael Harvey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rogers v. Burleigh Morton County Detention Center: N.D. et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Lemont Maurice Rogers
Defendant:
Burleigh Morton County Detention Center: N.D. and Bismarck N.D. Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
