Cases 41 - 50 of 279
Love v. Jackson County Sheriff Jail Division et al
as 2:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Love
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff Jail Division, Lt. Gregory L. Bagley and Sgt. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
William R. Wilborn
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox, Jason Young, E. Zejnelovic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Elvis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Unknown and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv00498
Petitioner:
D'Mante Dontrell Anderson
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, APD Officer A. Morell, APD Officer Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maddox v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Grace Maddox
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
David v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv00419
Petitioner:
Deonta David
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Melody Maddox, A. Morell, Andrea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullough v. Maddox
as 1:2022cv05055
Petitioner:
Alaye' S. McCullough
Respondent:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
