Cases 41 - 50 of 472
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ALLEN v. JASSEY et al
as 1:2022cv01343
Plaintiff:
KENT ALLEN, JR.
Defendant:
ANDY JASSEY and KENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ALLEN v. EK et al
as 1:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
KENT ALLEN, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL EK, KIARI CEPHUS and KENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ALLEN v. JASSEY et al
as 1:2022cv01351
Plaintiff:
KENT ALLEN, JR.
Defendant:
ANDY JASSEY and KENT ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
NOBLE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv01206
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NOBLE, MATTHEW SMITH, JONIE SMITH and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHARP v. DOLAN et al
as 1:2022cv01016
Plaintiff:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, CHRISTOPHE PIERRE, JOSE OSCAR VELASCO GARCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARTH v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUR. OF INVESTIGATION, HOMELAND SEC. INVESTIGATIONS. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ALLEN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
LEON ALLEN
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
BAYEH v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
BIZUAYEHU YLIMA BAYEH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and JOHN M. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
ALLEN v. DIXON
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ALLEN
Defendant:
ROBERT ANTHONY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
