Cases 41 - 50 of 119
McKinney v. Progressive Premier Insurance Company of Illinois et al
as 4:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Progressive Premier Insurance Company of Illinois and Erin Neel
Plaintiff:
James McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCKINNEY v. BALDWIN STATE PRISON MEDICAL STAFF
as 5:2020cv00301
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DEAN MCKINNEY
Defendant:
BALDWIN STATE PRISON MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney, Jr. v. Mullins et al
as 6:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Ms. Epperson, Mrs. Jackson, Sergeant Mullins and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn v. Atkins, et al
as 1:2020cv01749
Defendant:
Officer Brown, Officer Bloom, Sgt. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2020cv00072
Defendant:
GDC CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DIVISION, IVY, WARDEN SEAN EMMONS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. ROBERSON et al
as 5:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Officer HARPER, Officer KEISEY, Lieutenant ROBERSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. MARCUS et al
as 1:2020cv00058
Defendant:
CHARLIE JAMES MARCUS, CERT OFFICER CHARLES E HALL, CERT OFFICER MATHIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv01240
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Bettye McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKinney v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01048
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Stacey McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKINNEY v. MULLINS et al
as 6:2020cv00025
Defendant:
EPPERSON, Sergeant Mullins and Jackson
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE LAMONTE MCKINNEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
