Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Stop Franchising Spe LLC v. Michael Mendoza, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
STOP FRANCHISING SPE LLC
Defendant:
MICHAEL MENDOZA, INC. and Michael Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mendoza et al v. Daniels et al
as 3:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Justin Mendoza and Roy Trost
Defendant:
Director NDOC Charles Daniels, William Ruebart, Tasheena Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Fuentes et al v. Portier, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
Jason Fuentes, Cynthia Fuentes and Alex Mendoza
Defendant:
Portier, LLC and Phuong Minh Duong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mendoza v. Daniels et al
as 3:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Justin Mendoza, Ms. Mendoza and Amber Renee Meadows
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Minev, Ray Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2022cv00697
Petitioner:
Keith Arnold Scott
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
