Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Wright v. State of Iowa
as 4:2018cv00383
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Defendant:
State of Iowa
Plaintiff:
Alex Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyon v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00359
Defendant:
Microport Orthopedics, Inc. and Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Lyon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeHoet v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc et al
as 6:2018cv02050
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group, Inc and Wright Medical Technology, Inc
Plaintiff:
Linda DeHoet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00197
Petitioner:
Lemarcus Arthur Wright
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fairlie et al v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Fairlie and Odis Wright
Defendant:
Transamerica Life Insurance Company and Transamerica Premier Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Wright et al
as 4:2018cv00078
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Terry Wright, Timothy M. Duffy and Bill McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Hackenmiller et al
as 1:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
James Tyson
Defendant:
Julie Hackenmiller, Gary Maynard, Ron Wyse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moen v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc et al
as 6:2018cv02012
Plaintiff:
Greg Moen
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc and Wright Medical Group, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc., a Delaware Corporaiton et al
as 1:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Mark Hoover
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group, Inc and Wright Medical Technology, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoover v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc, et al
as 6:2018cv02001
Plaintiff:
Mark Hoover
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group, Inc and Wright Medical Technology, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
