Cases 41 - 50 of 126
Farah-Franco et al v. Rasmussen et al
as 1:2018cv10465
Plaintiff:
Sarah Farah-Franco and Russell Gourley
Defendant:
Christian J. Rasmussen, Francis J. Murphy, Murugesan Shanmugaraj and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Dennis v. Shanmugaraj et al
as 1:2017cv12571
Plaintiff:
Glade Dennis
Defendant:
Murugesan Shanmugaraj, Benny P. Mikkelsen, John F. Gavin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wong v. Shanmugaraj, et al
as 1:2017cv12550
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wong
Defendant:
Murugesan Shanmugaraj, John F. Gavin, Benny P. Mikkelsen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Acacia Communications, Inc., et al. v Murugesan Shanmugaraj, et al.
as 1:2017cv12350
Plaintiff:
Acacia Communications, Inc and Karen Colgan
Defendant:
Murugesan Shanmugaraj, Benny P. Mikkelsen, John F. Gavin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollhaus v. Acacia Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11988
Plaintiff:
Rina Rollhaus
Defendant:
Acacia Communications, Inc. , Murugesan Shanmugaraj , John F. Gavin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Liu et al v. Verizon New England Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11879
Plaintiff:
Yen Yi Liu and Wen Y. Chiang
Defendant:
Verizon New England Inc. , Verizon Wireless , Tucker, Saltzman, Dyer & O'Connell, LLP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv11556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
