Cases 41 - 50 of 531
Sutton v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
Douglas McArthur Sutton, III
Defendant:
Warden Gail Watts, S. Verch and Doctor Zowie Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. 133 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Dorchester County, Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
133 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN DORCHESTER COUNTY, MARYLAND, UNKNOWN HEIRS OF ELMER HANCOCK, JUDITH PERRINE and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Sutton v. Director Gail Watts et al
as 1:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Douglas McArthur Sutton, III
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Sgt. Salisbury, Sgt. Carter, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridgeford v. DPSCS
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bridgeford
Defendant:
DPSCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirst et al v. Erck et al
as 8:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
William Kirst and Christina Kirst
Defendant:
Stanley C Erck, Margaret G McGlynn, Rachel King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yung v. Erck et al
as 8:2021cv03248
Plaintiff:
Shui Shing Yung
Defendant:
Novavax, Inc., Stanley C. Erck, Gregory F. Covino and others
Shafer v. Warden
as 1:2021cv03052
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Douglas Shafer
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Meyer v. Erck et al
as 8:2021cv02996
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Meyer
Defendant:
Stanley C. Erck, Gregory F. Covino, John J. Trizzino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larcomb v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv02759
Plaintiff:
Douglas Larcomb
Defendant:
J Charles Smith, III, Frederick County, Maryland, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02392
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
