Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Matters v. Estes et al
as 1:2013cv00578
Plaintiff:
Richard K. Matters, Jr.
Defendant:
William J. Estes , John F. Barr and New York State Thruway Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson et al v. Standard Chartered Bank
as 1:2012cv06257
Plaintiff:
Deborah D. Peterson , Terry Abbott , John Robert Allman and others
Defendant:
Standard Chartered Bank, Samuel Hudson , Susan Thorstad Hugis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Village of Hempstead et al
as 2:2012cv03402
Defendant:
P.O. Louis Arcila, P.O. Este, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02662
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02661
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02660
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Zimmerman et al v. Estes Express Lines
as 1:2012cv02606
Plaintiff:
Julius Zimmerman, Jr. and Tamieka Goodwin
Defendant:
Estes Express Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02240
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02161
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
