Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Gipson v. USA
as 4:2016cv00435
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
L C Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Porter v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2016cv00649
Defendant:
Alesia Gipson, Stuart Jenkins and Mary Jane Serta
Plaintiff:
Deric Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abad et al v. Maxum Petroleum Operating Company et al
as 7:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Gabriel, Marlow Hilton, Alexander Abad and others
Defendant:
Maxum Petroleum Operating Company and Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gipson v. Livingston et al
as 1:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Earnie Gipson
Defendant:
Brad Livingston and Texas Board of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson v. Martin et al
as 1:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Earnie Gipson
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Dennis Melton and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
Dinesheia West , Dorothy Jones , Myra Leonard and others
Defendant:
Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Taylor v. Stevens, et al
as 5:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Trent Taylor
Defendant:
Marion Williams, Rebecca Ramirez, Raye Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gipson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2014cv00162
Petitioner:
Muranda Gabriel Gipson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gipson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2014cv02597
Petitioner:
Muranda Gabriel Gipson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tezeno v. Beaumont Independent School District
as 1:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
Dedric Tezeno , Warren Gipson , Robert E Wycoff and others
Defendant:
Beaumont Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
