Cases 41 - 50 of 625
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Nunez Rodriguez-Jimenez Mencia v. Portes Paredes
as 1:2023cv05571
Petitioner:
Divanna Altagracia Nunez Rodriguez-Jimenez Mencia
Respondent:
Luis Cley Portes Paredes
Gu v. Jimenez
as 1:2023cv04569
Plaintiff:
Feifei Gu
Defendant:
Sergio Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cedeno Jimenez v. CVS Pharmacy et al
as 1:2023cv05039
Petitioner:
Victoria Cedeno Jimenez
Respondent:
CVS Pharmacy and CVS Albany, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Jimenez-Ventura v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04428
Petitioner:
John Michael Jimenez-Ventura
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jimenez v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Brianna Jimenez and Brianna Bayer
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Acosta v. Delivery By J&S LLC et al
as 1:2023cv03554
Plaintiff:
Cesar G. Acosta
Defendant:
Delivery By J&S LLC, Enterprise Leasing Company of Philadelphia and Erick Jimenez Grijalva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jimenez v. Searls
as 1:2023cv00379
Petitioner:
David De Oliveira Jimenez and Dayvid De Oliveira Jimenez
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
