Cases 41 - 50 of 2,307
Picotte v. Frazier et al
as 2:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
John Kyle Picotte
Defendant:
Warden Frazier, A.W. Ashcroft, C/O Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00495
Petitioner:
John Turner
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Demos Jr. v. USA et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos Jr.
Respondent:
USA and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kirby v. Brietenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
John Edward Kirby
Respondent:
Warden Brietenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hood v. Friel Jr. et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Perry A. Hood
Defendant:
John J. Friel Jr. and Chris Arabia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perasso et al v. Sims et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Perasso and Jesus Sanchez-Paez
Defendant:
John Sims, Nancy Sims, Irene Zanchez-Paez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
