Cases 41 - 50 of 615
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TACCINO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv03115
Plaintiff:
VRINDER SINGH RANDHAWA, WILLIAM A. TACCINO and CAROL J. TACCINO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
JONES et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02764
Plaintiff:
STANLEY JONES and DEBRA JONES
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER and CITIMORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CHAMPION et al v. DOES
as 1:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CHAMPION and CHRISTINA JONES
Defendant:
DOES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
